Africa vs Kiribati: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Africa
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 700.91 % against 204.76 % in Africa, a difference of 496.15 %.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 3.4 times Africa's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Africa ranks 5th and Kiribati ranks 4th of 32 groups.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 188.03 % | 573.93 % | 385.9 % | Kiribati |
| 1970s | 171.08 % | 585.52 % | 414.44 % | Kiribati |
| 1980s | 157.51 % | 741.24 % | 583.73 % | Kiribati |
| 1990s | 181.77 % | 639.97 % | 458.2 % | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 197.23 % | 625.99 % | 428.75 % | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 202.42 % | 725.49 % | 523.06 % | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 199.27 % | 671.84 % | 472.58 % | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Africa or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 700.91 % against 204.76 % in Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Africa and Kiribati?
- 496.15 %, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Africa and Kiribati rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Africa ranks 5th and Kiribati ranks 4th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).