Albania vs Colombia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Albania
- Colombia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 38.84 % against 38.14 % in Albania, a difference of 0.7 %.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.
Albania ranks 154th and Colombia ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17.44 % | 46.6 % | 29.16 % | Colombia |
| 1970s | 22.98 % | 55.64 % | 32.66 % | Colombia |
| 1980s | 23.08 % | 50.51 % | 27.44 % | Colombia |
| 1990s | 11.65 % | 38.17 % | 26.52 % | Colombia |
| 2000s | 12.76 % | 35.46 % | 22.7 % | Colombia |
| 2010s | 22.02 % | 35.63 % | 13.62 % | Colombia |
| 2020s | 32.38 % | 37.44 % | 5.06 % | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Albania or Colombia?
- Colombia, at 38.84 % against 38.14 % in Albania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Albania and Colombia?
- 0.7 %, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Colombia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Albania and Colombia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Albania ranks 154th and Colombia ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).