Albania vs Namibia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Albania
- Namibia
How they compare
Albania currently reports 38.14 % against 36.75 % in Namibia, a difference of 1.39 %.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.
Albania ranks 154th and Namibia ranks 157th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17.44 % | 16.88 % | 0.5663 % | Albania |
| 1970s | 22.98 % | 20.61 % | 2.37 % | Albania |
| 1980s | 23.08 % | 27.93 % | 4.85 % | Namibia |
| 1990s | 11.65 % | 32.41 % | 20.76 % | Namibia |
| 2000s | 12.76 % | 39.59 % | 26.84 % | Namibia |
| 2010s | 22.02 % | 38.96 % | 16.95 % | Namibia |
| 2020s | 32.38 % | 44.55 % | 12.17 % | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Albania or Namibia?
- Albania, at 38.14 % against 36.75 % in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Albania and Namibia?
- 1.39 %, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Namibia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Albania and Namibia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Albania ranks 154th and Namibia ranks 157th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).