Algeria vs Azerbaijan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Algeria
- Azerbaijan
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 194.01 % against 183.4 % in Algeria, a difference of 10.61 %.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Algeria's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Algeria ranks 31st and Azerbaijan ranks 28th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 2 and Azerbaijan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Azerbaijan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100.93 % | 121.23 % | 20.3 % | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 133.59 % | 148.23 % | 14.64 % | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 184.05 % | 160.19 % | 23.86 % | Algeria |
| 2020s | 195.11 % | 192.55 % | 2.56 % | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Algeria or Azerbaijan?
- Azerbaijan, at 194.01 % against 183.4 % in Algeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Algeria and Azerbaijan?
- 10.61 %, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Azerbaijan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Algeria and Azerbaijan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Algeria ranks 31st and Azerbaijan ranks 28th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).