Angola vs Viet Nam: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Angola
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Angola currently reports 251.72 % against 57.18 % in Viet Nam, a difference of 194.54 %.
That makes Angola's figure about 4.4 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 18th and Viet Nam ranks 17th of 186 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 268.31 % | 43.43 % | 224.88 % | Angola |
| 1970s | 163.32 % | 50.12 % | 113.2 % | Angola |
| 1980s | 96.86 % | 64.69 % | 32.17 % | Angola |
| 1990s | 119.01 % | 62.6 % | 56.41 % | Angola |
| 2000s | 219.87 % | 46.22 % | 173.65 % | Angola |
| 2010s | 219.79 % | 48.97 % | 170.82 % | Angola |
| 2020s | 235.46 % | 51.12 % | 184.34 % | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Angola or Viet Nam?
- Angola, at 251.72 % against 57.18 % in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Angola and Viet Nam?
- 194.54 %, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Viet Nam?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Viet Nam rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Angola ranks 18th and Viet Nam ranks 17th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).