Antigua and Barbuda vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency

Antigua and Barbuda
16.72 %
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR
17.7 %
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
172nd
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
169th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • China, Hong Kong SAR
050100150200250196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 17.7 % against 16.72 % in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.98 %.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Antigua and Barbuda's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 172nd and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 169th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and China, Hong Kong SAR in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda China, Hong Kong SAR Difference Ahead
1960s 121.04 % 38.22 % 82.82 % Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 23.11 % 30.32 % 7.21 % China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 8.94 % 26.62 % 17.69 % China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 8.57 % 29.16 % 20.59 % China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 9.38 % 17.75 % 8.37 % China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 15.59 % 16.8 % 1.2 % China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 14.71 % 17.53 % 2.82 % China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Antigua and Barbuda or China, Hong Kong SAR?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 17.7 % against 16.72 % in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Antigua and Barbuda and China, Hong Kong SAR?
0.98 %, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and China, Hong Kong SAR?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 172nd and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 169th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/antigua-and-barbuda/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/antigua-and-barbuda/china-hong-kong-sar/">Antigua and Barbuda vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).