Antigua and Barbuda vs Slovenia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 16.87 % against 16.72 % in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.15 %.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 171st and Slovenia ranks 170th of 185 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.55 % | 13.9 % | 5.35 % | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 9.38 % | 15.82 % | 6.44 % | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 15.59 % | 16.84 % | 1.25 % | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 14.71 % | 18.09 % | 3.39 % | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Antigua and Barbuda or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 16.87 % against 16.72 % in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Antigua and Barbuda and Slovenia?
- 0.15 %, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Slovenia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 171st and Slovenia ranks 170th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).