Argentina vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency

Argentina
409.95 %
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
116.6 %
in 2023
Argentina rank
7th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
10th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time

  • Argentina
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 409.95 % against 116.6 % in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 293.35 %.

That makes Argentina's figure about 3.5 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Argentina ranks 7th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 6 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 91.06 % 105.98 % 14.92 % Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 107.35 % 105.09 % 2.26 % Argentina
1980s 153.44 % 107.5 % 45.94 % Argentina
1990s 245.19 % 119.66 % 125.53 % Argentina
2000s 429.23 % 123.56 % 305.67 % Argentina
2010s 559.28 % 117.82 % 441.46 % Argentina
2020s 533.67 % 117.81 % 415.87 % Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Argentina or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Argentina, at 409.95 % against 116.6 % in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Argentina and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
293.35 %, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
Argentina ranks 7th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/argentina/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/argentina/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Argentina vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).