Armenia vs Central African Republic: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Armenia
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 146.5 % against 142.39 % in Central African Republic, a difference of 4.11 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Armenia ranks 43rd and Central African Republic ranks 46th of 186 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 101.08 % | 91.32 % | 9.76 % | Armenia |
| 2000s | 201.44 % | 73.82 % | 127.62 % | Armenia |
| 2010s | 217.41 % | 99.39 % | 118.02 % | Armenia |
| 2020s | 139.3 % | 137.54 % | 1.76 % | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Armenia or Central African Republic?
- Armenia, at 146.5 % against 142.39 % in Central African Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Armenia and Central African Republic?
- 4.11 %, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Central African Republic?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Central African Republic rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Armenia ranks 43rd and Central African Republic ranks 46th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).