Asia vs Tunisia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Asia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 253.58 % against 78.59 % in Asia, a difference of 174.99 %.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 3.2 times Asia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Asia ranks 22nd and Tunisia ranks 21st of 32 groups.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 74.94 % | 159.34 % | 84.4 % | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 78.09 % | 191.5 % | 113.42 % | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 78.22 % | 223.87 % | 145.64 % | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 76.85 % | 279.56 % | 202.72 % | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 74.33 % | 209.19 % | 134.86 % | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 73.29 % | 240.84 % | 167.56 % | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 76.99 % | 245 % | 168.01 % | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Asia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 253.58 % against 78.59 % in Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Asia and Tunisia?
- 174.99 %, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Asia and Tunisia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Asia ranks 22nd and Tunisia ranks 21st of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).