Australia and New Zealand vs Malawi: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency

Australia and New Zealand
165.62 %
in 2023
Malawi
155.83 %
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
36th
Malawi rank
39th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Malawi
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 165.62 % against 155.83 % in Malawi, a difference of 9.79 %.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 36th and Malawi ranks 39th of 186 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 53.77 % 220.76 % 166.99 % Malawi
1970s 53.92 % 227.14 % 173.22 % Malawi
1980s 78.64 % 205.89 % 127.25 % Malawi
1990s 90.11 % 272.51 % 182.4 % Malawi
2000s 95.19 % 299.62 % 204.43 % Malawi
2010s 116.35 % 231.67 % 115.32 % Malawi
2020s 130.2 % 162.33 % 32.14 % Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Australia and New Zealand or Malawi?
Australia and New Zealand, at 165.62 % against 155.83 % in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Australia and New Zealand and Malawi?
9.79 %, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Malawi?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Malawi rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 36th and Malawi ranks 39th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Malawi: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/australia-and-new-zealand/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/australia-and-new-zealand/malawi/">Australia and New Zealand vs Malawi: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).