Austria vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Austria
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 41.74 % against 40.21 % in Austria, a difference of 1.53 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 136th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.7 % | 23.92 % | 1.78 % | Austria |
| 2000s | 32.42 % | 24.36 % | 8.06 % | Austria |
| 2010s | 36.53 % | 26.4 % | 10.13 % | Austria |
| 2020s | 40.6 % | 40.87 % | 0.2675 % | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Austria or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 41.74 % against 40.21 % in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Austria and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 1.53 %, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Austria ranks 136th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).