Azerbaijan vs Cabo Verde: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Azerbaijan
- Cabo Verde
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 194.01 % against 39.98 % in Cabo Verde, a difference of 154.03 %.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 4.9 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 28th and Cabo Verde ranks 27th of 186 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Cabo Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 121.23 % | 19.55 % | 101.68 % | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 148.23 % | 38.56 % | 109.67 % | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 160.19 % | 55.3 % | 104.89 % | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 192.55 % | 43.41 % | 149.14 % | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Azerbaijan or Cabo Verde?
- Azerbaijan, at 194.01 % against 39.98 % in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Azerbaijan and Cabo Verde?
- 154.03 %, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Cabo Verde?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Cabo Verde rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Azerbaijan ranks 28th and Cabo Verde ranks 27th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).