Azerbaijan vs Central Asia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Azerbaijan
- Central Asia
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 194.01 % against 43.29 % in Central Asia, a difference of 150.72 %.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 4.5 times Central Asia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 33rd and Central Asia ranks 30th of 201 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Central Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 121.23 % | 49.15 % | 72.08 % | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 148.23 % | 57.57 % | 90.66 % | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 160.19 % | 48.96 % | 111.24 % | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 192.55 % | 46.85 % | 145.7 % | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Azerbaijan or Central Asia?
- Azerbaijan, at 194.01 % against 43.29 % in Central Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Azerbaijan and Central Asia?
- 150.72 %, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Central Asia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Central Asia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Azerbaijan ranks 33rd and Central Asia ranks 30th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).