Azerbaijan vs Ethiopia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Azerbaijan
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 194.01 % against 184.35 % in Ethiopia, a difference of 9.66 %.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 28th and Ethiopia ranks 30th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 3 and Ethiopia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 117.85 % | 115.08 % | 2.77 % | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 148.23 % | 140.58 % | 7.66 % | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 160.19 % | 166.71 % | 6.52 % | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 192.55 % | 190.28 % | 2.27 % | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Azerbaijan or Ethiopia?
- Azerbaijan, at 194.01 % against 184.35 % in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Azerbaijan and Ethiopia?
- 9.66 %, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Ethiopia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Azerbaijan ranks 28th and Ethiopia ranks 30th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).