Azerbaijan vs Mali: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Azerbaijan
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 211.99 % against 194.01 % in Azerbaijan, a difference of 17.98 %.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mali ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 33rd and Mali ranks 31st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Mali in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 121.23 % | 172.39 % | 51.16 % | Mali |
| 2000s | 148.23 % | 119.47 % | 28.77 % | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 160.19 % | 175.37 % | 15.18 % | Mali |
| 2020s | 192.55 % | 178.9 % | 13.65 % | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Azerbaijan or Mali?
- Mali, at 211.99 % against 194.01 % in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Azerbaijan and Mali?
- 17.98 %, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Mali?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Mali rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Azerbaijan ranks 33rd and Mali ranks 31st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).