Bahamas vs Sudan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency

Bahamas
101.6 %
in 2023
Sudan
99.91 %
in 2023
Bahamas rank
82nd
Sudan rank
83rd

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time

  • Bahamas
  • Sudan
255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 101.6 % against 99.91 % in Sudan, a difference of 1.69 %.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 82nd and Sudan ranks 83rd of 201 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 73.18 % 99.27 % 26.09 % Sudan
2020s 101.46 % 114.19 % 12.73 % Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Bahamas or Sudan?
Bahamas, at 101.6 % against 99.91 % in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Bahamas and Sudan?
1.69 %, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Sudan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
Bahamas ranks 82nd and Sudan ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).