Belarus vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Belarus
- China, Hong Kong SAR
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 17.99 % against 17.7 % in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.29 %.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
Belarus ranks 167th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 168th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and China, Hong Kong SAR in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | China, Hong Kong SAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.45 % | 30.27 % | 12.82 % | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2000s | 19.49 % | 17.75 % | 1.74 % | Belarus |
| 2010s | 18.44 % | 16.8 % | 1.64 % | Belarus |
| 2020s | 17.78 % | 17.53 % | 0.2499 % | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Belarus or China, Hong Kong SAR?
- Belarus, at 17.99 % against 17.7 % in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Belarus and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 0.29 %, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Belarus ranks 167th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 168th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).