Belarus vs New Caledonia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Belarus
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 17.99 % against 16.94 % in New Caledonia, a difference of 1.05 %.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Belarus ranks 183rd and New Caledonia ranks 185th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and New Caledonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.45 % | 17.26 % | 0.1989 % | Belarus |
| 2000s | 19.49 % | 16.09 % | 3.4 % | Belarus |
| 2010s | 18.44 % | 18.11 % | 0.3262 % | Belarus |
| 2020s | 17.78 % | 18.45 % | 0.6769 % | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Belarus or New Caledonia?
- Belarus, at 17.99 % against 16.94 % in New Caledonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Belarus and New Caledonia?
- 1.05 %, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Caledonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and New Caledonia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Belarus ranks 183rd and New Caledonia ranks 185th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).