Belarus vs Switzerland: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Belarus
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 19.67 % against 17.99 % in Belarus, a difference of 1.68 %.
That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Switzerland ahead.
Belarus ranks 183rd and Switzerland ranks 182nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.45 % | 17.08 % | 0.3745 % | Belarus |
| 2000s | 19.49 % | 19.82 % | 0.3333 % | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 18.44 % | 20.74 % | 2.3 % | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 17.78 % | 19.8 % | 2.02 % | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Belarus or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 19.67 % against 17.99 % in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Belarus and Switzerland?
- 1.68 %, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Switzerland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Switzerland rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Belarus ranks 183rd and Switzerland ranks 182nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).