Belgium-Luxembourg vs Norway: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 28.12 % against 27.2 % in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 0.92 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 158th and Norway ranks 157th of 185 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium-Luxembourg | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.89 % | 26.94 % | 16.04 % | Norway |
| 1970s | 12.58 % | 25.38 % | 12.8 % | Norway |
| 1980s | 15.66 % | 26.11 % | 10.45 % | Norway |
| 1990s | 21.68 % | 28.13 % | 6.45 % | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Belgium-Luxembourg or Norway?
- Norway, at 28.12 % against 27.2 % in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Belgium-Luxembourg and Norway?
- 0.92 %, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Norway?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Norway rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 158th and Norway ranks 157th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).