Belgium vs Republic of Korea: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Belgium
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 33.8 % against 30.91 % in Republic of Korea, a difference of 2.89 %.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Republic of Korea's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Belgium ranks 151st and Republic of Korea ranks 153rd of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Republic of Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.94 % | 32.88 % | 1.94 % | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 32.52 % | 30.32 % | 2.21 % | Belgium |
| 2020s | 31.8 % | 30.32 % | 1.47 % | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Belgium or Republic of Korea?
- Belgium, at 33.8 % against 30.91 % in Republic of Korea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Belgium and Republic of Korea?
- 2.89 %, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Republic of Korea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Republic of Korea rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Belgium ranks 151st and Republic of Korea ranks 153rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).