Belize vs Russian Federation: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Belize
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 82.12 % against 74.23 % in Belize, a difference of 7.89 %.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 100th and Russian Federation ranks 97th of 201 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 225.34 % | 28.31 % | 197.03 % | Belize |
| 2000s | 900.16 % | 48.58 % | 851.58 % | Belize |
| 2010s | 241.29 % | 67.67 % | 173.62 % | Belize |
| 2020s | 86.63 % | 78.04 % | 8.59 % | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Belize or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 82.12 % against 74.23 % in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Belize and Russian Federation?
- 7.89 %, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Russian Federation rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Belize ranks 100th and Russian Federation ranks 97th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).