Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chad: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Chad
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 41.74 % against 40.52 % in Chad, a difference of 1.22 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chad ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd and Chad ranks 134th of 186 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23.92 % | 89.28 % | 65.35 % | Chad |
| 2000s | 24.36 % | 71.68 % | 47.32 % | Chad |
| 2010s | 26.4 % | 67.05 % | 40.65 % | Chad |
| 2020s | 40.87 % | 47.41 % | 6.54 % | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Chad?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 41.74 % against 40.52 % in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chad?
- 1.22 %, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chad?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chad rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd and Chad ranks 134th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).