Burundi vs Republic of Moldova: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Burundi
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 245.71 % against 127.04 % in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 118.67 %.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.9 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 19th and Republic of Moldova ranks 12th of 186 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 986.07 % | 57.22 % | 928.85 % | Burundi |
| 2000s | 1,042 % | 87.89 % | 954.44 % | Burundi |
| 2010s | 437.42 % | 108.16 % | 329.26 % | Burundi |
| 2020s | 278.51 % | 111.74 % | 166.78 % | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Burundi or Republic of Moldova?
- Burundi, at 245.71 % against 127.04 % in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Burundi and Republic of Moldova?
- 118.67 %, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Republic of Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Republic of Moldova rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Burundi ranks 19th and Republic of Moldova ranks 12th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).