Cabo Verde vs Chad: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Cabo Verde
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports 40.52 % against 39.98 % in Cabo Verde, a difference of 0.54 %.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 150th and Chad ranks 147th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 1 and Chad in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 175.88 % | 124.21 % | 51.67 % | Cabo Verde |
| 1970s | 73.61 % | 117.69 % | 44.08 % | Chad |
| 1980s | 53.38 % | 98.4 % | 45.02 % | Chad |
| 1990s | 23.02 % | 90.58 % | 67.56 % | Chad |
| 2000s | 38.56 % | 71.68 % | 33.12 % | Chad |
| 2010s | 55.3 % | 67.05 % | 11.75 % | Chad |
| 2020s | 43.41 % | 47.41 % | 4 % | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Cabo Verde or Chad?
- Chad, at 40.52 % against 39.98 % in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Cabo Verde and Chad?
- 0.54 %, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Chad?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Chad rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Cabo Verde ranks 150th and Chad ranks 147th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).