Cabo Verde vs Ethiopia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Cabo Verde
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 184.35 % against 39.98 % in Cabo Verde, a difference of 144.37 %.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 4.6 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 27th and Ethiopia ranks 30th of 29 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.99 % | 115.08 % | 95.09 % | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 38.56 % | 140.58 % | 102.01 % | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 55.3 % | 166.71 % | 111.41 % | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 43.41 % | 190.28 % | 146.87 % | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Cabo Verde or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 184.35 % against 39.98 % in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Cabo Verde and Ethiopia?
- 144.37 %, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Ethiopia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Cabo Verde ranks 27th and Ethiopia ranks 30th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).