Cambodia vs Ethiopia PDR: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Cambodia
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 98.24 % against 95.08 % in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 3.16 %.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 75th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 78th of 186 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 26.24 % | 88.62 % | 62.38 % | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 18.7 % | 94.82 % | 76.12 % | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 22.24 % | 108.36 % | 86.13 % | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 19.24 % | 104.67 % | 85.43 % | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Cambodia or Ethiopia PDR?
- Cambodia, at 98.24 % against 95.08 % in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Cambodia and Ethiopia PDR?
- 3.16 %, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Cambodia and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Cambodia ranks 75th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 78th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).