Caribbean vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency

Caribbean
231.22 %
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1,308 %
in 2023
Caribbean rank
3rd
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
1st

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time

  • Caribbean
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
05001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 1,308 % against 231.22 % in Caribbean, a difference of 1,077 %.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 5.7 times Caribbean's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.

Caribbean ranks 3rd and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 1st of 29 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Caribbean Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 88.3 % 924.05 % 835.75 % Democratic Republic of the Congo
1970s 72.72 % 831.23 % 758.51 % Democratic Republic of the Congo
1980s 62.34 % 906.16 % 843.82 % Democratic Republic of the Congo
1990s 81.46 % 843.58 % 762.12 % Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 123.79 % 871.1 % 747.31 % Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 135.68 % 1,286 % 1,150 % Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 197.58 % 1,343 % 1,145 % Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Caribbean or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 1,308 % against 231.22 % in Caribbean as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Caribbean and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
1,077 %, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Caribbean and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
Caribbean ranks 3rd and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 1st of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Caribbean vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/caribbean/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/caribbean/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Caribbean vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).