Caribbean vs Türkiye: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Caribbean
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 357.53 % against 231.22 % in Caribbean, a difference of 126.31 %.
That makes Türkiye's figure about 1.5 times Caribbean's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Türkiye has been ahead every year.
Caribbean ranks 3rd and Türkiye ranks 3rd of 29 countries.
Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 88.3 % | 231.58 % | 143.28 % | Türkiye |
| 1970s | 72.72 % | 288.06 % | 215.34 % | Türkiye |
| 1980s | 62.34 % | 336.07 % | 273.73 % | Türkiye |
| 1990s | 81.46 % | 355.55 % | 274.09 % | Türkiye |
| 2000s | 123.79 % | 364.72 % | 240.93 % | Türkiye |
| 2010s | 135.68 % | 336.12 % | 200.44 % | Türkiye |
| 2020s | 197.58 % | 331.87 % | 134.29 % | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Caribbean or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 357.53 % against 231.22 % in Caribbean as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Caribbean and Türkiye?
- 126.31 %, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Türkiye rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Caribbean ranks 3rd and Türkiye ranks 3rd of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).