China, Hong Kong SAR vs Slovenia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Slovenia
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 17.7 % against 16.87 % in Slovenia, a difference of 0.83 %.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 169th and Slovenia ranks 171st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30.27 % | 13.9 % | 16.38 % | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2000s | 17.75 % | 15.82 % | 1.93 % | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2010s | 16.8 % | 16.84 % | 0.0494 % | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 17.53 % | 18.09 % | 0.5644 % | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, China, Hong Kong SAR or Slovenia?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 17.7 % against 16.87 % in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between China, Hong Kong SAR and Slovenia?
- 0.83 %, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Slovenia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 169th and Slovenia ranks 171st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).