China, Hong Kong SAR vs Switzerland: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency

China, Hong Kong SAR
17.7 %
in 2023
Switzerland
19.67 %
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
169th
Switzerland rank
167th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Switzerland
1020304050196119922023

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 19.67 % against 17.7 % in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 1.97 %.

That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 169th and Switzerland ranks 167th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 4 and Switzerland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Switzerland Difference Ahead
1960s 38.22 % 12.52 % 25.7 % China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 30.32 % 11.71 % 18.61 % China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 26.62 % 13.67 % 12.96 % China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 29.16 % 16.57 % 12.59 % China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 17.75 % 19.82 % 2.07 % Switzerland
2010s 16.8 % 20.74 % 3.94 % Switzerland
2020s 17.53 % 19.8 % 2.27 % Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, China, Hong Kong SAR or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 19.67 % against 17.7 % in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between China, Hong Kong SAR and Switzerland?
1.97 %, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Switzerland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Switzerland rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 169th and Switzerland ranks 167th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Switzerland: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/china-hong-kong-sar/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/china-hong-kong-sar/switzerland/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Switzerland: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).