China, Hong Kong SAR vs Tuvalu: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency

China, Hong Kong SAR
17.7 %
in 2023
Tuvalu
20.43 %
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
169th
Tuvalu rank
166th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Tuvalu
20406080196119922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 20.43 % against 17.7 % in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 2.73 %.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.2 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tuvalu ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 169th and Tuvalu ranks 166th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Tuvalu in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 38.22 % 64.41 % 26.19 % Tuvalu
1970s 30.32 % 46.67 % 16.36 % Tuvalu
1980s 26.62 % 38.84 % 12.22 % Tuvalu
1990s 29.16 % 17.83 % 11.33 % China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 17.75 % 16.9 % 0.8472 % China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 16.8 % 16.98 % 0.1848 % Tuvalu
2020s 17.53 % 21.31 % 3.79 % Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, China, Hong Kong SAR or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 20.43 % against 17.7 % in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between China, Hong Kong SAR and Tuvalu?
2.73 %, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Tuvalu rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 169th and Tuvalu ranks 166th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Tuvalu: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/china-hong-kong-sar/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/china-hong-kong-sar/tuvalu/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Tuvalu: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).