Colombia vs Eritrea: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Colombia
- Eritrea
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 38.84 % against 37.41 % in Eritrea, a difference of 1.43 %.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Colombia ranks 153rd and Eritrea ranks 156th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.51 % | 73.63 % | 36.12 % | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 35.46 % | 42.08 % | 6.62 % | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 35.63 % | 38.34 % | 2.71 % | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 37.44 % | 37.39 % | 0.0479 % | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Colombia or Eritrea?
- Colombia, at 38.84 % against 37.41 % in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Colombia and Eritrea?
- 1.43 %, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Eritrea rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Colombia ranks 153rd and Eritrea ranks 156th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).