Congo vs Eastern Europe: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Congo
- Eastern Europe
How they compare
Congo currently reports 239.3 % against 76.8 % in Eastern Europe, a difference of 162.5 %.
That makes Congo's figure about 3.1 times Eastern Europe's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 24th and Eastern Europe ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Eastern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 276.15 % | 27.22 % | 248.93 % | Congo |
| 1970s | 150.01 % | 21.71 % | 128.3 % | Congo |
| 1980s | 398.01 % | 18.32 % | 379.69 % | Congo |
| 1990s | 346.96 % | 31.1 % | 315.87 % | Congo |
| 2000s | 466.01 % | 48.08 % | 417.93 % | Congo |
| 2010s | 473.83 % | 62.6 % | 411.23 % | Congo |
| 2020s | 290.84 % | 70.95 % | 219.89 % | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Congo or Eastern Europe?
- Congo, at 239.3 % against 76.8 % in Eastern Europe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Congo and Eastern Europe?
- 162.5 %, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eastern Europe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Eastern Europe rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Congo ranks 24th and Eastern Europe ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).