Cyprus vs South Sudan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Cyprus
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 25.16 % against 24.9 % in Cyprus, a difference of 0.26 %.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 164th and South Sudan ranks 163rd of 186 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 27.09 % | 22.67 % | 4.41 % | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 24.76 % | 24.45 % | 0.3034 % | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Cyprus or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 25.16 % against 24.9 % in Cyprus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Cyprus and South Sudan?
- 0.26 %, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and South Sudan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Cyprus ranks 164th and South Sudan ranks 163rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).