Czechia vs Haiti: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Czechia
- Haiti
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 82.86 % against 74.56 % in Czechia, a difference of 8.3 %.
That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Haiti ahead.
Czechia ranks 99th and Haiti ranks 96th of 201 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 41.94 % | 100.63 % | 58.69 % | Haiti |
| 2000s | 53.48 % | 82.39 % | 28.91 % | Haiti |
| 2010s | 63.86 % | 89.64 % | 25.78 % | Haiti |
| 2020s | 76.09 % | 82.04 % | 5.94 % | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Czechia or Haiti?
- Haiti, at 82.86 % against 74.56 % in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Czechia and Haiti?
- 8.3 %, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Haiti?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Haiti rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Czechia ranks 99th and Haiti ranks 96th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).