Czechoslovakia vs Denmark: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Denmark
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 34.8 % against 34.08 % in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 0.72 %.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 164th and Denmark ranks 161st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechoslovakia averaged higher in 2 and Denmark in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16.03 % | 12.38 % | 3.65 % | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 12.03 % | 15.06 % | 3.03 % | Denmark |
| 1980s | 13.6 % | 21.01 % | 7.4 % | Denmark |
| 1990s | 27.63 % | 25.92 % | 1.71 % | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Czechoslovakia or Denmark?
- Denmark, at 34.8 % against 34.08 % in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Czechoslovakia and Denmark?
- 0.72 %, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Denmark?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Denmark rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 164th and Denmark ranks 161st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).