Czechoslovakia vs Spain: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Spain
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 34.08 % against 31.25 % in Spain, a difference of 2.83 %.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.1 times Spain's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 164th and Spain ranks 166th of 201 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16.03 % | 44.81 % | 28.78 % | Spain |
| 1970s | 12.03 % | 38.62 % | 26.6 % | Spain |
| 1980s | 13.6 % | 41.02 % | 27.41 % | Spain |
| 1990s | 27.63 % | 37.84 % | 10.2 % | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Czechoslovakia or Spain?
- Czechoslovakia, at 34.08 % against 31.25 % in Spain as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Czechoslovakia and Spain?
- 2.83 %, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Spain?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Spain rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 164th and Spain ranks 166th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).