Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Dominican Republic: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency

Democratic People's Republic of Korea
141.99 %
in 2023
Dominican Republic
371.23 %
in 2023
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
10th
Dominican Republic rank
10th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time

  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Dominican Republic
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 371.23 % against 141.99 % in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a difference of 229.24 %.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 2.6 times Democratic People's Republic of Korea's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 10th and Dominican Republic ranks 10th of 18 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Democratic People's Republic of Korea averaged higher in 1 and Dominican Republic in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic People's Republic of Korea Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 114.25 % 125.11 % 10.86 % Dominican Republic
1970s 67.91 % 93.19 % 25.27 % Dominican Republic
1980s 88.29 % 110.41 % 22.13 % Dominican Republic
1990s 181.5 % 83.97 % 97.53 % Democratic People's Republic of Korea
2000s 112.41 % 171.62 % 59.21 % Dominican Republic
2010s 118.08 % 216.75 % 98.67 % Dominican Republic
2020s 145.05 % 301.06 % 156.02 % Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Democratic People's Republic of Korea or Dominican Republic?
Dominican Republic, at 371.23 % against 141.99 % in Democratic People's Republic of Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Dominican Republic?
229.24 %, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Dominican Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Dominican Republic rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 10th and Dominican Republic ranks 10th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Dominican Republic: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/dominican-republic/">Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Dominican Republic: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).