Dominican Republic vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency

Dominican Republic
371.23 %
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
116.6 %
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
10th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
10th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 371.23 % against 116.6 % in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 254.63 %.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 3.2 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 10th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 5 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 125.11 % 105.98 % 19.13 % Dominican Republic
1970s 93.19 % 105.09 % 11.9 % Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 110.41 % 107.5 % 2.91 % Dominican Republic
1990s 83.97 % 119.66 % 35.69 % Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 171.62 % 123.56 % 48.06 % Dominican Republic
2010s 216.75 % 117.82 % 98.93 % Dominican Republic
2020s 301.06 % 117.81 % 183.26 % Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Dominican Republic or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Dominican Republic, at 371.23 % against 116.6 % in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Dominican Republic and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
254.63 %, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
Dominican Republic ranks 10th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/dominican-republic/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/dominican-republic/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Dominican Republic vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).