Eastern Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency

Eastern Africa
154.54 %
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
190.06 %
in 2023
Eastern Africa rank
8th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time

  • Eastern Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
050100150200250196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 190.06 % against 154.54 % in Eastern Africa, a difference of 35.52 %.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.2 times Eastern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Eastern Africa ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 29 groups.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 143.2 % 154.46 % 11.26 % United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 152.04 % 166.65 % 14.61 % United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 144.24 % 183.96 % 39.72 % United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 143.59 % 178.7 % 35.11 % United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 160.5 % 201.6 % 41.1 % United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 159.59 % 230.29 % 70.69 % United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 156.83 % 192.94 % 36.11 % United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Eastern Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 190.06 % against 154.54 % in Eastern Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Eastern Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
35.52 %, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eastern Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
Eastern Africa ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/eastern-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/eastern-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Eastern Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).