El Salvador vs Georgia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- El Salvador
- Georgia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 67.68 % against 67.41 % in Georgia, a difference of 0.27 %.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 106th and Georgia ranks 107th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77.52 % | 98.51 % | 20.99 % | Georgia |
| 2000s | 89.46 % | 84.49 % | 4.97 % | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 70.58 % | 72.39 % | 1.81 % | Georgia |
| 2020s | 66.35 % | 71.05 % | 4.71 % | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, El Salvador or Georgia?
- El Salvador, at 67.68 % against 67.41 % in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between El Salvador and Georgia?
- 0.27 %, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Georgia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- El Salvador ranks 106th and Georgia ranks 107th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).