Eritrea vs Finland: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Eritrea
- Finland
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 37.41 % against 35.35 % in Finland, a difference of 2.06 %.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 156th and Finland ranks 159th of 201 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 73.63 % | 23.51 % | 50.12 % | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 42.08 % | 32.49 % | 9.59 % | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 38.34 % | 35.93 % | 2.41 % | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 37.39 % | 34.97 % | 2.42 % | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Eritrea or Finland?
- Eritrea, at 37.41 % against 35.35 % in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Eritrea and Finland?
- 2.06 %, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Finland?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Finland rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Eritrea ranks 156th and Finland ranks 159th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).