Estonia vs Kyrgyz Republic: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Estonia
- Kyrgyz Republic
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 35.32 % against 34.63 % in Kyrgyz Republic, a difference of 0.69 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyz Republic ahead.
Estonia ranks 145th and Kyrgyz Republic ranks 147th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyz Republic in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Kyrgyz Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.05 % | 34.92 % | 17.87 % | Kyrgyz Republic |
| 2000s | 22.15 % | 52.98 % | 30.83 % | Kyrgyz Republic |
| 2010s | 28.29 % | 40.49 % | 12.2 % | Kyrgyz Republic |
| 2020s | 36.7 % | 35 % | 1.7 % | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Estonia or Kyrgyz Republic?
- Estonia, at 35.32 % against 34.63 % in Kyrgyz Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Estonia and Kyrgyz Republic?
- 0.69 %, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Kyrgyz Republic?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Kyrgyz Republic rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Estonia ranks 145th and Kyrgyz Republic ranks 147th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).