Ethiopia PDR vs Indonesia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Indonesia
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 95.08 % against 94.61 % in Indonesia, a difference of 0.47 %.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Indonesia ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 89th and Indonesia ranks 90th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 2 and Indonesia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 88.62 % | 106.73 % | 18.11 % | Indonesia |
| 1970s | 94.82 % | 124.31 % | 29.49 % | Indonesia |
| 1980s | 108.36 % | 105.04 % | 3.33 % | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 104.67 % | 94.18 % | 10.49 % | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Ethiopia PDR or Indonesia?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 95.08 % against 94.61 % in Indonesia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Ethiopia PDR and Indonesia?
- 0.47 %, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Indonesia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Indonesia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 89th and Indonesia ranks 90th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).