Ethiopia vs Southern Europe: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Ethiopia
- Southern Europe
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 184.35 % against 39.12 % in Southern Europe, a difference of 145.23 %.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 4.7 times Southern Europe's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 30th and Southern Europe ranks 28th of 186 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Southern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 115.08 % | 37.14 % | 77.94 % | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 140.58 % | 40.76 % | 99.82 % | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 166.71 % | 43.7 % | 123.01 % | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 190.28 % | 42.44 % | 147.83 % | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Ethiopia or Southern Europe?
- Ethiopia, at 184.35 % against 39.12 % in Southern Europe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Ethiopia and Southern Europe?
- 145.23 %, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Southern Europe?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Southern Europe rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Ethiopia ranks 30th and Southern Europe ranks 28th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).