France vs North Macedonia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- France
- North Macedonia
How they compare
France currently reports 57.54 % against 55.5 % in North Macedonia, a difference of 2.04 %.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was France ahead.
France ranks 110th and North Macedonia ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, France averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 27.87 % | 29.31 % | 1.44 % | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 38.17 % | 36.65 % | 1.51 % | France |
| 2010s | 48.85 % | 41.48 % | 7.37 % | France |
| 2020s | 52.33 % | 53.65 % | 1.32 % | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, France or North Macedonia?
- France, at 57.54 % against 55.5 % in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between France and North Macedonia?
- 2.04 %, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do France and North Macedonia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- France ranks 110th and North Macedonia ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).