France vs Saint Lucia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- France
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 58.35 % against 57.54 % in France, a difference of 0.81 %.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
France ranks 122nd and Saint Lucia ranks 121st of 201 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18.99 % | 231.59 % | 212.6 % | Saint Lucia |
| 1970s | 17.33 % | 159.34 % | 142.01 % | Saint Lucia |
| 1980s | 20.1 % | 405.54 % | 385.44 % | Saint Lucia |
| 1990s | 26.91 % | 486.55 % | 459.63 % | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 38.17 % | 164.04 % | 125.87 % | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 48.85 % | 97.15 % | 48.3 % | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 52.33 % | 71.45 % | 19.12 % | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, France or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 58.35 % against 57.54 % in France as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between France and Saint Lucia?
- 0.81 %, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Saint Lucia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do France and Saint Lucia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- France ranks 122nd and Saint Lucia ranks 121st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).