France vs Viet Nam: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- France
- Viet Nam
How they compare
France currently reports 57.54 % against 57.18 % in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.36 %.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Viet Nam ahead.
France ranks 122nd and Viet Nam ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, France averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18.99 % | 43.43 % | 24.45 % | Viet Nam |
| 1970s | 17.33 % | 50.12 % | 32.79 % | Viet Nam |
| 1980s | 20.1 % | 64.69 % | 44.59 % | Viet Nam |
| 1990s | 26.91 % | 62.6 % | 35.69 % | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 38.17 % | 46.22 % | 8.05 % | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 48.85 % | 48.97 % | 0.1171 % | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 52.33 % | 51.12 % | 1.21 % | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, France or Viet Nam?
- France, at 57.54 % against 57.18 % in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between France and Viet Nam?
- 0.36 %, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Viet Nam?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do France and Viet Nam rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- France ranks 122nd and Viet Nam ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).